Call Us Today: 0800 773 4931

Litigation is won and lost on the quality of the evidence and the intelligence underpinning the legal strategy. Legal argument, however carefully constructed, can only work with the facts it has. Locating a witness who cannot be found through conventional means, establishing what assets a judgment debtor actually holds, gathering intelligence on a counterparty’s true financial position before proceedings are issued, or testing the credibility of a witness’s account before they face cross-examination — these are investigative questions that fall outside what legal teams are positioned to answer themselves.
Bond Rees litigation support services for law firms provide the independent investigative capability that solicitors and counsel require to prepare and advance cases across the full range of commercial, civil, and regulatory proceedings. We work as a professional extension of the legal team — directed by instructing solicitors, operating within the evidential and privilege framework they define, and producing output to the standard that court proceedings require.
We do not offer generic investigation services repackaged for a legal audience. Every instruction from a legal team is assessed with the specific evidential requirements of the relevant proceedings in mind. The methods our litigation support specialists deploy, the way we document what we do, and the form in which we present findings are all shaped by the legal context — the forum, the disclosure obligations, the privilege position, and the particular questions that the litigation strategy needs to answer.
If you are instructing solicitors with an active matter or an approaching deadline where investigative support would strengthen your client’s position, we welcome a confidential discussion.
To enquire about our litigation support services in confidence, contact our investigations team here or call 0800 002 9468. We work to legal timescales and can respond quickly where urgency requires it.

Litigation support investigations arise at every stage of the legal process — pre-action, during proceedings, and in the enforcement phase following judgment. The following scenarios reflect real-life instructions that we have handled from law firms and legal teams, and the specific roles that investigative intelligence played in each.
A commercial litigation team was preparing to issue proceedings against a defendant in a substantial contractual dispute. Before proceedings were issued, they required an independent assessment of the defendant’s asset position — both to evaluate the commercial viability of the claim and to support a without-notice freezing injunction application if proceedings went ahead.
Asset tracing for litigation support identified a portfolio of UK commercial and residential properties held across personal and corporate structures, financial interests not visible in the defendant’s publicly filed accounts, and indicators of recent asset movement that supported the risk of dissipation argument central to the injunction application. The findings were incorporated directly into the evidence in support of the without-notice application.
A law firm acting for a claimant in contested civil proceedings required a process serving of documents on a defendant who had made themselves deliberately difficult to locate following the commencement of proceedings.
Standard service methods had been exhausted without success. Our expert tracing agents identified the defendant’s current residential address and confirmed their regular patterns of movement to a degree of certainty sufficient to allow personal service to be effected by a process server on a confirmed attendance. The matter was resolved without the need to make a substituted service application to the court.
Counsel acting in a significant commercial dispute required background intelligence on the opposing party’s principal witness before the matter came to trial. The witness had provided a statement that was central to the opposing party’s case and whose credibility, if undermined, would materially affect the outcome.
Our private investigators undertook a witness background investigation identified a pattern of civil litigation involving the witness in a personal capacity, a previous statement made in related proceedings that appeared inconsistent with the current account, and a professional conduct matter that had not been disclosed. Counsel used the intelligence to structure a cross-examination strategy that addressed each of these matters in sequence.

A law firm advising a client in a complex commercial dispute required intelligence on the corporate structure, financial position, and principal relationships of the opposing corporate entity — a privately held business whose ownership and ultimate control were not clearly established from publicly available information.
Bond Rees corporate investigators executed a business intelligence investigation for the litigation team that clarified the beneficial ownership structure through a combination of Companies House analysis, overseas registry research, and source enquiries, established the financial position of the group beyond the filed accounts, and identified connected entities through which value was being held or moved. The intelligence informed both the pre-trial strategy and the enforcement planning that ran in parallel with the proceedings.
Solicitors defending a substantial personal injury claim on behalf of a corporate client required surveillance evidence to challenge the claimant’s account of their ongoing disability and inability to work. The claimed limitations, if accepted, would result in a significant damages award.
We investigators planned a surveillance investigation for the legal case, conducted over a 3-week period, produced video evidence of the claimant engaged in physical activity (including football, home DIY, and shopping) materially inconsistent with the expert medical evidence filed in support of the claim. The evidence was disclosed in proceedings in the appropriate format, was the subject of detailed submissions, and resulted in a substantially reduced award.

A law firm holding an unsatisfied High Court judgment on behalf of its client had been unable to locate assets through standard enforcement procedures. The judgment debtor had provided minimal information in oral examination and the standard enforcement tools had produced no recovery.
We carried out a hidden asset trace investigation for the legal team identified real property registered in the name of a family member, a beneficial interest under a discretionary trust, and bank account indicators in an overseas jurisdiction. The intelligence allowed the litigation team to pursue enforcement through a charging order application, a beneficiary information request, and an overseas enforcement process in parallel — producing a recovery that standard enforcement had entirely failed to achieve.

Bond Rees legal investigation services cover the full range of investigative activities that litigation teams require, from pre-action intelligence through to post-judgment enforcement support. The following describes the principal categories of work we conduct for law firms and legal teams.
Independent investigation of the asset position of a party to litigation — pre-action, in support of interim applications, or post-judgment in the enforcement phase. Corporate asset tracing for litigation cases covers UK real property, corporate and financial interests, beneficial interests under trusts and nominee structures, and overseas assets where the subject has international connections. Findings are prepared specifically for the legal use to which they will be put: full and frank disclosure in a freezing application, an asset schedule for enforcement proceedings, or a recovery intelligence brief for the client.
Locating individuals who cannot be found through conventional means — defendants evading service, missing witnesses, former employees whose evidence is required, or individuals who have moved without leaving a traceable address. Witness tracing services draw on a combination of open source research, corporate and public record analysis, and discreet enquiries. Where personal service is required following a location exercise, we coordinate with process servers to effect service at the identified address.
Independent investigation of the background and credibility of witnesses — whether the opposing party’s key witnesses, expert witnesses, or individuals whose evidence is material to the case but whose reliability is in question. Witness credibility investigations examine litigation history, prior statements in related proceedings, professional conduct record, financial interests relevant to the subject matter of the proceedings, and — through discreet source enquiries — professional reputation. Findings are provided in a form that allows counsel to assess and deploy the intelligence strategically in cross-examination preparation or in submissions on witness reliability.
Investigation of the corporate structure, ownership, financial position, and principal relationships of corporate parties to litigation — particularly privately held entities whose true ownership, financial position, and associated interests are not fully disclosed in publicly available records. Corporate investigation services for lawyers provide the intelligence needed to assess enforcement viability, to identify undisclosed connections that may be relevant to the substantive dispute, and to understand the commercial context within which the litigation is taking place.
Covert surveillance in support of litigation — producing photographic and video evidence of individual activity, associations, or conduct relevant to the matters in issue. Common applications include personal injury and disability fraud defence, contested employment cases, intellectual property infringement investigations, and the monitoring of compliance with injunctions or undertakings. Surveillance evidence for court is prepared to the specific standards applicable to the relevant proceedings and provided in a format consistent with disclosure requirements.
Independent investigation of fraud allegations in support of civil proceedings — establishing the mechanism, identifying the individuals responsible, tracing the proceeds, and producing evidence to the standard required for use in contested civil litigation. Corporate fraud litigation investigations cover the full range of commercial fraud categories: procurement fraud, financial misrepresentation, embezzlement, bribery, and complex financial crime.
Our international corporate investigations include evidence gathering and intelligence support for proceedings with an international dimension — locating overseas assets, investigating foreign corporate structures, gathering intelligence on overseas witnesses and parties, and coordinating with our international partner network to produce findings that can be used in English proceedings or in overseas enforcement processes.

The relationship between a litigation team and its investigative support firm is a professional one that works best when it is structured from the outset around the specific requirements of the proceedings. We are not a general-purpose investigative resource that legal teams direct on an ad hoc basis. We operate as a structured component of the case preparation process, with defined instructions, agreed outputs, and a clear understanding of how our findings will be used.
We accept instructions directly from solicitors, in-house legal teams, and — where appropriate — through counsel’s chambers. Instructions made through solicitors can be structured to preserve legal professional privilege over investigative communications and findings, where the instruction is made in the context of existing or anticipated litigation. The privilege position is discussed at the outset of each instruction and the engagement structure is agreed accordingly.
All litigation support investigations are conducted with the specific evidential requirements of the relevant proceedings in mind. This means that the methods used to gather evidence, the documentation of those methods, and the form in which findings are presented are all structured to satisfy the admissibility and disclosure requirements applicable to the forum — whether the High Court, County Court, Employment Tribunal, arbitration, or a regulatory proceeding. We do not present findings that cannot survive scrutiny of the method by which they were obtained. Where evidence is challenged, we provide the documentary support that allows the challenge to be met.
Where investigative findings are relied upon in proceedings, it is frequently necessary for the investigating operative or analyst to provide a witness statement and, if required, to attend the hearing to give oral evidence. We prepare witness statements in the appropriate format for the specific proceedings and our investigators are available to attend as witnesses where this is required. This forms part of our standard service for litigation instructions that proceed to hearing.
The format of reporting, the frequency of interim updates, the distribution of findings, and the communication protocols during the investigation are agreed at the outset of each instruction. We work within whatever case management framework the instructing solicitor has established and are available to attend case conferences, counsel’s meetings, or client briefings where the litigation team requires a direct account of the investigative position.
To discuss using our litigation support services or to establish a standing arrangement for investigative support across your case portfolio, contact Bond Rees in confidence.

Litigation support investigations require a process that is responsive to legal timescales, structured around evidential requirements, and sufficiently flexible to respond to new information as it emerges during a case. Our process is built around those demands.
Every instruction begins with a discussion of the legal context — the nature of the proceedings, the specific questions the investigation needs to answer, the timescale available, the intended use of the findings, and the privilege and disclosure framework applicable to the instruction. Understanding the legal context is not preliminary to the investigation; it shapes every decision made during it.
The agreed scope is confirmed in writing before any investigative activity begins. The written instruction identifies the subjects and entities to be investigated, the specific questions the investigation is tasked with answering, the methods authorised, the timescale, and the format and distribution of the findings report. This confirmation serves both as the operational brief for the investigation and as the documentary record of the instruction’s basis and scope — relevant if the investigation or its findings are subsequently examined by the court or by opposing parties.
The investigation proceeds using the methods appropriate to the specific instruction — records research, corporate intelligence, open source analysis, source enquiries, surveillance, witness location, or a combination of these. All information is gathered by lawful means, cross-referenced against independent sources, and documented from the point of capture. The chain of custody for all evidence is maintained throughout. Where significant findings emerge during the investigation, we communicate them to the instructing solicitor promptly rather than holding all intelligence to the final report.
Findings are presented in a structured written report tailored to the specific proceedings and the intended audience. Where multiple outputs are required — a brief for counsel, a detailed evidence annex, a witness statement for disclosure — these are prepared simultaneously rather than sequentially. We attend case conferences or counsel’s meetings where our findings need to be explained directly, and we provide the documentary support that allows the legal team to deploy the evidence with confidence.

Our litigation investigation services are used across a range of practice areas. The following describes how investigative support applies in the contexts in which we are most frequently instructed.
Commercial dispute investigation services covering asset intelligence, counterparty investigation, corporate intelligence, and fraud investigation in support of High Court commercial litigation, arbitration, and dispute resolution proceedings. Pre-action intelligence is particularly valuable in commercial litigation — it informs the decision to litigate, shapes the interim relief strategy, and ensures that the enforcement position is understood before the costs of proceedings are committed.
Forensic investigation services for lawyers handling fraud claims, financial misrepresentation, embezzlement, and complex financial crime. Financial investigation for legal disputes in this category requires the ability to trace payment flows, identify the mechanism and quantum of a fraud, locate the proceeds, and produce findings that can withstand the scrutiny of expert cross-examination. We work alongside forensic accountants and digital forensics specialists where the instruction requires it, providing the investigative intelligence that financial analysis generates hypotheses about but cannot independently confirm.
Litigation evidence investigation services for employment disputes — misconduct dismissals, whistleblower claims, restrictive covenant enforcement, and discrimination proceedings — where surveillance evidence, witness background intelligence, or corporate connection research is relevant to the substantive issues. Regulatory proceedings involving professional bodies, the FCA, or sector-specific regulators also frequently benefit from independent investigative intelligence on the background and conduct of the individuals under scrutiny.
Asset discovery investigations and debtor intelligence in support of insolvency practitioners, judgment creditors, and enforcement solicitors. Background investigations for court cases in the insolvency context cover antecedent transaction tracing, director conduct investigation, and the identification of assets held through connected parties or nominee structures that standard enforcement methods do not reach.
Surveillance investigations for legal cases involving personal injury, disability, and workers’ compensation claims — producing video and photographic evidence of claimant activity for use in contested proceedings or in settlement negotiations. Evidence is gathered, documented, and disclosed in the format required by the relevant court or forum, with full operative statement support and attendance at hearing where required.

The requirements of litigation-grade investigative work are sufficiently distinct from general corporate investigations to make the choice of specialist matter. Evidence that is gathered competently but not to court standards, intelligence that cannot be disclosed without compromising its source, or a witness trace that cannot be confirmed to a degree of certainty sufficient for service — these are not acceptable outcomes in a legal context. The difference between investigation that serves the litigation and investigation that complicates it is almost always the quality of the specialist engaged.
An investigator who understands what a court requires — how evidence must be documented, what disclosure obligations apply, how a witness statement must be structured, and what the consequences are of evidence obtained by improper means — makes different decisions throughout an investigation than one who does not. Those differences accumulate. The evidence produced by litigation-experienced investigators requires less remedial work by the legal team, survives challenge more reliably, and is more readily deployed in the specific proceedings for which it was gathered.
Legal teams preparing cases for litigation frequently reach a point where the information they have does not provide the complete picture they need — where a witness cannot be located, where the counterparty’s true financial position is not clear from disclosed documents, or where the credibility of a key witness needs to be tested before the matter comes to trial. Independent litigation support investigators provide the intelligence that closes those gaps, and do so in a form that the legal team can deploy without creating new problems around disclosure or privilege.
The most effective litigation support is not reactive — it is integrated into the case strategy from the point at which the decision to litigate is made. Asset intelligence informs the interim relief strategy. Counterparty intelligence shapes the approach to disclosure and the cross-examination plan. Witness credibility investigation informs settlement decisions as well as trial preparation. A litigation support firm that understands how to integrate its output into legal strategy adds value at every stage of the case, not merely when a specific investigative task needs to be completed.
Contact Bond Rees to protect your business from risk today.

Yes. Instructions made through solicitors for the purpose of obtaining legal advice, or in connection with anticipated or existing litigation, may attract legal professional privilege over investigative communications and findings. The privilege position depends on the specific circumstances of the instruction — including who makes the instruction, the stated purpose, and the nature of the findings produced.
We discuss the privilege framework at the outset of every litigation instruction and structure the engagement in the manner most protective of privilege. Where there is doubt about the privilege position of specific elements of the instruction, we advise the instructing solicitor so that they can take appropriate steps.
Our Litigation Support Services team are accustomed to working to legal timescales, including those driven by without-notice applications and imminent hearing dates. For urgent instructions — particularly asset tracing for freezing injunction applications, witness location for impending service deadlines, or surveillance instructions with a short operational window — we discuss the specific deadline and confirm at the outset whether the required output can be delivered within the available time.
Where the full scope of an instruction cannot be completed within an urgent deadline, we advise on what can be achieved and produce a preliminary report for the immediate application, with a fuller report to follow.
All our investigative methods are lawful, and we structure investigations from the outset on the assumption that the methods used may need to be disclosed if challenged. We do not use methods that we would be unable to defend in proceedings. That said, source intelligence and human intelligence gathered through discreet enquiries raises specific disclosure considerations that we discuss with instructing solicitors at the reporting stage. We do not present intelligence derived from sources we cannot adequately account for without appropriate qualification, and we advise the legal team where specific findings have a source basis that may be sensitive.
Our investigators are not retained as expert witnesses in the formal sense. We provide factual witness evidence from the investigators who conducted the relevant surveillance, location, or intelligence gathering — accounts of what was done, by what means, and what was observed or found.
These factual witness statements are prepared in the appropriate format for the relevant proceedings. Where expert opinion evidence on investigative methodology is required, we can advise on appropriate experts. The distinction between factual and expert evidence is discussed with the instructing solicitor at the outset of any instruction where attendance at hearing is anticipated.
The preferred model for litigation support instructions is that we work through the instructing solicitor, with all reporting and communication routed through the legal team. This protects privilege, ensures that findings are interpreted and deployed within the legal strategy, and maintains the proper structure for the legal proceedings. In some circumstances — particularly where in-house legal teams are instructing without external solicitors — we work directly with the in-house legal function. The specific communication model is agreed at the outset and documented in the instruction confirmation.
Yes. International arbitration and overseas proceedings are a regular context for our litigation support instructions. Asset tracing, counterparty intelligence, witness location, and evidence gathering in support of LCIA, ICC, and other international arbitral proceedings require familiarity with both the evidentiary requirements of the specific institution’s rules and the practical investigative considerations in the relevant jurisdictions.
We work with the instructing legal team and, where necessary, with overseas counsel to ensure that findings are produced in a form consistent with the requirements of the relevant forum.
Yes. Law firms with regular investigative requirements across their caseload can establish a standing arrangement that provides a consistent point of contact, agreed service parameters, and reporting protocols that do not need to be renegotiated for each individual instruction. Standing arrangements are also available for in-house legal and compliance teams with ongoing investigative requirements. We discuss the appropriate structure for regular clients based on the volume and nature of the work anticipated. Contact our Litigation Support Services today.
Litigation support services for law firms work best when the investigative resource is engaged as a genuine component of the legal team’s case strategy — not as a reactive afterthought when a specific task needs completing under pressure. The firms that make most effective use of independent investigative support are those that bring it in early, brief it properly, and treat its output as intelligence that informs strategic decisions rather than evidence to be gathered in isolation.
We are a specialist litigation support company with experience across commercial litigation, fraud and financial crime proceedings, employment disputes, insolvency, personal injury defence, and international arbitration. Every instruction is accepted on the basis that we understand the legal context, will work within the privilege and disclosure framework the instructing solicitor requires, and will produce findings to the evidential standard that the specific proceedings demand.
Whether you have an immediate requirement on an active matter or are looking to establish a working relationship with a specialist litigation support firm for your practice, a confidential conversation with our team is the natural starting point.
Contact our litigation support team to discuss an instruction or to arrange an introductory meeting. All enquiries are handled with complete discretion and without obligation by Bond Rees professionals.
Copyright Bond Rees 2025
Call Us: 0800 002 9468